[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #3613 [Pluggable transport]: obfsproxy: groundwork for new protocols
#3613: obfsproxy: groundwork for new protocols
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: zwol | Owner: asn
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Pluggable transport | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by asn):
Alright, I think I'm now up to date with all the design changes till
19eda9f8.
I'll now start looking at x_http and x_dsteg.
BTW, we should probably decide on code style, before we bastardize the
whole code base. For example, connections.c functions are now commented on
the header file. I don't like this [0], but if we decide to keep it like
this, we should migrate the rest of the code as well.
obfs2 must be revived before merging your stuff. It serves as a nice basic
transport example. I rolled back to 674d0735 and manually tested obfs2 and
it seems to work.
I also used the old int_test.sh on it, and it worked nicely. I'm not sure
why it doesn't work on tester.py; I haven't checked the code of
tester.py.in that much.
I have a bug3613_shutdown branch in my repo which fixes a small issue
while shutting down obfsproxy barbarically.
Thanks for your work!
[0]: I enjoy easily viewing the function documentation while checking out
a function's code.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3613#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs