[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #6545 [Tor Client]: Isolation level may be funky and share circuits?

#6545: Isolation level may be funky and share circuits?
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  sdjfjsdfiuhszduh  |          Owner:                    
     Type:  defect            |         Status:  needs_information 
 Priority:  normal            |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component:  Tor Client        |        Version:                    
 Keywords:                    |         Parent:                    
   Points:                    |   Actualpoints:                    
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 Replying to [comment:8 rransom]:
 > The hidden service code shouldn't cause this.

 But do we need more hidden service code to ensure that stream isolation
 works properly with hidden service requests?

 >I would suspect the HTTP proxy first here, but also, the reporter clearly
 does not understand what â`IsolateClientAddr`â means.  (The
 â`SessionGroup`â feature is what separates streams on different
 SocksPorts.)

 To be clear, though, different SocksPorts are put into different
 SessionGroups by default.  You don't need to specify an explicit
 SessionGroup to make streams on different SocksPorts isolated from one
 another .

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6545#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs