[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #23586 [Webpages/Website]: fingerprint in documentation is wrong
#23586: fingerprint in documentation is wrong
------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: kkuehl@… | Owner: traumschule
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Medium | Milestone: website redesign
Component: Webpages/Website | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: gpg fingerprint | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: hiro | Sponsor:
------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by traumschule):
* owner: hiro => traumschule
* reviewer: => hiro
Comment:
With gpg 2.2.9 on debian it looks like this:
{{{
$ gpg --fingerprint 0x4E2C6E8793298290
pub rsa4096/0x4E2C6E8793298290 2014-12-15 [C] [expires: 2020-08-24]
Key fingerprint = EF6E 286D DA85 EA2A 4BA7 DE68 4E2C 6E87 9329 8290
uid [ unknown] Tor Browser Developers (signing key)
<torbrowser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
sub rsa4096/0xD1483FA6C3C07136 2016-08-24 [S] [expires: 2018-08-24]
Key fingerprint = A430 0A6B C93C 0877 A445 1486 D148 3FA6 C3C0 7136
sub rsa4096/0xEB774491D9FF06E2 2018-05-26 [S] [expires: 2020-09-12]
Key fingerprint = 1107 75B5 D101 FB36 BC6C 911B EB77 4491 D9FF 06E2
}}}
I have no way to test it on windows but propose to update the website to
resemble the output of a modern gpg assuming it looks similar with
gpg4win. What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23586#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs