[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component: Tor | Version: Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
Keywords: tor-auth | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:8 nickm]:
> If we compare node->last_reachable after node->is_running, we should
pretty much just ignore all the other fields (advertised bw, identity),
since we'll almost never get a tie on last_reachable.
I think that would be extra bad, because it would make each dir auth
inconsistent about which sybils it picks, and worse, each dir auth would
be differently inconsistent. We want something where the globally emergent
behavior is consistent.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs