[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #25188 [Core Tor/Tor]: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt

To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: Re: [tor-bugs] #25188 [Core Tor/Tor]: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt
From: "Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 13:35:09 -0000
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 08:35:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <051.352aa02228aed0d9fcd37a1d4594e9e8@torproject.org>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-bugs/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "auto: Tor bug tracker status mails" <tor-bugs.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs>, <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-bugs>, <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <051.352aa02228aed0d9fcd37a1d4594e9e8@torproject.org>
Reply-to: no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tor-assistants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-bugs" <tor-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

#25188: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt
--------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  witchof0x20   |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  enhancement   |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Very Low      |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.3.4.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |        Version:
 Severity:  Trivial       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-spec      |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                |         Points:  0.1
 Reviewer:                |        Sponsor:
--------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by nickm):

 Hm. I like this change, but it wouldn't match the current implementation.
 We should decide whether or not we like this better than the current
 behavior, and (if we want to change it) how to change it in a maximally
 privacy-friendly way.

 The current implementation is something more like 'a keyword may not be "
 -----BEGIN"'.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25188#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

References:
- [tor-bugs] #25188 [Core Tor/Tor]: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt
  - From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-bugs] #24250 [Core Tor/Tor]: In a private network some relays advertise zero bandwidth-observed
Next by Author: Re: [tor-bugs] #24456 [Core Tor/Tor]: Figure out what to do with the guardfraction feature
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-bugs] #25188 [Core Tor/Tor]: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt
Next by thread: Re: [tor-bugs] #25188 [Core Tor/Tor]: Spec bug in formal definition of Document in dir-spec.txt
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread