[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #12631 [Applications/Tor Browser]: Tor Browser for ARM architecture
#12631: Tor Browser for ARM architecture
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: mttp | Owner: (none)
Type: project | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Applications/Tor Browser | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tbb-rbm | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by gk):
Replying to [comment:21 gk]:
> Replying to [comment:20 JeremyRand]:
> > Updated my rbm descriptors for ARM to work with ESR 60.
https://notabug.org/JeremyRand/tor-browser-build/src/armhf-esr60 (the
armhf-esr60 branch). Docs still at
https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/Porting/Tor_Browser . One noteworthy thing
is that, due to what is probably
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1452128 , I needed to upgrade
to gcc 7.3.0 / binutils 2.29.1. I don't know if that's a dealbreaker for
Tor (and I haven't carefully tested whether the upgrade breaks anything on
non-ARM platforms). Can anyone from Tor comment on whether the specific
gcc / binutils versions used by Tor Browser were chosen for a particular
reason, and whether upgrading them would be considered if it's the most
straightforward way to get ARM to work?
>
> Thanks for working on the ARM port, really appreciated! Updating GCC to
7.3.0 is probably no problem.
That's now #29335 and will happen in a couple of weeks once we start with
the 9.0 alpha series and is the last missing piece as we already bumped
binutils to 2.31.1.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12631#comment:23>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs