[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #32928 [Core Tor/Tor]: Tor Manual: Split Circuit Timeout options into their own subsection
#32928: Tor Manual: Split Circuit Timeout options into their own subsection
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner: (none)
Type: task | Status:
| needs_review
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.3.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: documentation tor-client manpage | Actual Points:
easy 043-can extra-review |
Parent ID: #4310 | Points: 0.5
Reviewer: catalyst, nickm | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by swati):
Replying to [comment:8 catalyst]:
Currently, there are only four Dormant mode options in the manual -
DormantCanceledByStartup, DormantOnFirstStartup, DormantClientTimeout and
DormantTimeoutDisabledByIdleStreams. Do you think we can have a separate
section for dormant mode with just these four options? If yes, I'll put
them out from here and create a new section.
> Replying to [comment:6 swati]:
> > Thanks, Taylor. Regarding your comment about renaming the section to
'Circuit Timeout Options', I see that I have added DormantClientTimeout
and DormantTimeoutDisabledByIdleStreams options to this section. Are these
two circuit options as well?
>
> I see. I think you're right there. They're client options that aren't
directly related to circuit timeouts. They might belong in a separate
section about Dormant mode?
>
> > Also, should I add the following circuit options to this section:?
>
> Unfortunately, I think these are a little bit tricky to classify. Maybe
we want to expand the section heading to include client circuit behavior
overall? (The Nodes options have to do with the details of building a
circuit, while many of these operations are at a higher level of
abstraction that ignores individual nodes in a circuit.)
>
> > MaxCircuitDirtiness
>
> I think this is not directly timing related? This is related to reusing
a circuit for multiple application streams. I think there is a tradeoff
between circuit reuse (for efficiency and decreased latency) and traffic
analysis risk.
>
> > MaxClientCircuitsPending
>
> I'm not quite sure how this one interacts with timing.
>
> > CircuitPadding
> > ReducedCircuitPadding
>
> I think these aren't directly timing-related. These options are related
to a countermeasure that we use against traffic analysis. There is a
tradeoff because the countermeasure can increase bandwidth consumption. (I
guess in situations of highly constrained bandwidth it could decrease
performance in a user-visible way.)
>
> > NewCircuitPeriod
> > PathsNeededToBuildCircuits
>
> These help tor decide when to build new circuits.
PathsNeededToBuildCircuits is a bit more strongly related to the
bootstrapping process than the other options here, so I'm not quite sure
whether it belongs with the others.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32928#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs