[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #19206 [Applications/Tor Browser]: SOCKS isolation should include a process identifier.

#19206: SOCKS isolation should include a process identifier.
--------------------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  yawning                   |          Owner:  tbb-team
     Type:  enhancement               |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium                    |      Milestone:
Component:  Applications/Tor Browser  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                    |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  TorBrowserTeam201606R     |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                            |         Points:
 Reviewer:                            |        Sponsor:
--------------------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by yawning):

 * status:  needs_revision => needs_review


Comment:

 And pushed.  Someone that cares more than I do can add a pref for actually
 skipping the `NEWNYM`, since it should no longer be necessary as long as
 our isolation code is actually working as intended.

 My usecase never gives Tor Browser direct access to the control port
 anyway, so I'm just suppressing the signal there...

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19206#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs