[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #19317 [Metrics/CollecTor]: Sanitize TCP ports in bridge descriptors
#19317: Sanitize TCP ports in bridge descriptors
-------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/CollecTor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by iwakeh):
Replying to [comment:5 karsten]:
> .... `H(...)[:2] / 2^2 + 2^15 + 2^15`.
should be `2^15 + 2^14` as it is in both html and java code. The latter
might be more readable when using java7 features, i.e.
{{{
#!java
int hashedPort =
((((hashInput[0] & 0b1111_1111) << 8) | (hashInput[1] & 0b1111_1111)) >>
2)
| 0b1100_0000_0000_0000;
}}}
How much privacy is actually gained with all this?
Reducing the range gives some privacy, but how much given that the
original ports are not randomly distributed in their range?
Just point me to an appropriate doc, if this question seems trivial.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org:443/projects/tor/ticket/19317#comment:6>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs