[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #4086 [Analysis]: Compare performance of TokenBucketRefillInterval params in simulated network

#4086: Compare performance of TokenBucketRefillInterval params in simulated
network
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:       
     Type:  task                     |         Status:  new  
 Priority:  normal                   |      Milestone:       
Component:  Analysis                 |        Version:       
 Keywords:  performance flowcontrol  |         Parent:  #4465
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:       
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by robgjansen):

 Replying to [comment:8 Flo]:
 > Thanks for the results and the great work. Overall it looks very good
 and promising: Web clients benefit most from the smaller refill intervals
 and data transmission is smoothed. Though, I'm a little surprised by the
 divergence of the red line (100ms) on page 4 of Kevin's runs. For me the
 outlier looks like an anomaly/ artifact. Are there any reasons which
 explain such a behavior?

 Comparing Kevin's page 4 to page 4 of my refill-perf-ewma0.pdf would
 suggest that Kevin's 10 ms line is the anomaly/artifact, not the 100 ms
 line. Things are better when CircuitPriorityHalflife is set.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4086#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs