[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #11327 [Tor]: Dir auths should choose Fast and Guard flags by consensus weight if they don't measure
#11327: Dir auths should choose Fast and Guard flags by consensus weight if they
don't measure
----------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: tor-auth | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
----------------------+------------------------------------
In #8435 we made directory-authorities-that-run-bwauths stop voting Fast
or Guard for relays they hadn't measured yet.
But as I pointed out in
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8435#comment:13, since
only a minority of dir auths run bwauths, the majority of dir auths are
still voting Fast and Guard based on descriptor bandwidths.
So while the title of ticket #8435 says "Ignore advertised bandwidths for
flags once we have enough measured bandwidths", the ChangeLog entry is
more accurate:
{{{
- Directory authorities that have more than a threshold number
of relays with measured bandwidths now treat relays with unmeasured
bandwidths as having bandwidth 0. Resolves ticket 8435.
}}}
We should at some point actually do the original goal, which is to give
Fast to the 7/8s of relays whose consensus weights are highest, and Guard
to the 1/2 of relays whose consensus weights are highest and who match the
other guard constraints.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11327>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs