[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #5837 [Tor bundles/installation]: Use IDA Pro and/or BinDiff to inspect releases



#5837: Use IDA Pro and/or BinDiff to inspect releases
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:  mikeperry                 |          Owner:  cypherpunks
     Type:  project                   |         Status:  new        
 Priority:  major                     |      Milestone:             
Component:  Tor bundles/installation  |        Version:             
 Keywords:  volunteer                 |         Parent:  #5292      
   Points:                            |   Actualpoints:             
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by mikeperry:

Old description:

> We have some concerning issues with our build processes. It's hard to
> really know for sure that the build machines are secure and not tampered
> with. See for example #5689. The most likely situation there is that AV
> signature engines fucking suck, and were false positives. However, the
> real fix is not simply scanning the build machines with more shitty AV
> software (although it was a fine, rational first step -- I'm not hating
> on you, Erinn). The real fix is unfortunately much harder: We need to
> ensure that the same source produces the same binaries everywhere: #3688.
>
> Other than build reproduction, it's nearly fucking impossible to know
> that the binaries you get actually come from the source you wrote and
> audited. A handful of Open Source projects have figured it out (see
> comments in #3688), but it's actually pretty darn hard on Windows, if not
> impossible.
>
> As a stop-gap solution, it's occurred to me that we might be able to
> crowdsource hobbyists and people looking to learn reversing (or if we're
> really lucky, some people who already have these skills) to both help
> verify previous builds, and give us the input we need to proceed on
> #3688.
>
> If you have access to IDA Pro
> ([http://blog.zynamics.com/2011/12/05/bindiff-4-0-available-today/
> BinDiff] will help, but is an extra $200 extension to IDA Pro and is not
> required), you can participate as follows:
>

> 1. Download a signed TBB release from
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/.
>
> 2. Compile your own TBB bundle. This is somewhat tricky and may require
> its own instructions which Sebastian is working on writing for Windows
> and Linux, and already exist in
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torbrowser.git/tree/master:/docs/buildmachine_setups
> for Mac OS.
>
> 3. BinDiff the resulting packaging exe as well as the exes contained
> therein.
>
> If you lack BinDiff, you should consider focusing your efforts on MacOS
> and Linux packages, which should be substantially more similar than
> Windows, especially if you build on Debian/Lenny or MacOS 10.7 with Xcode
> 4. Start with using the 'cmp' (or hexdump and diff) Unix commands to find
> the differing sections of the binaries, and then use IDA Pro to inspect
> those sections.
>
> You should be able to use IDA Pro for any platform to analyze binaries
> for any other platform. You do not need to buy the MacOS copy to analyze
> MacOS binaries.
>
> 4. Text diff the non-exe components (for example, conf files, shell
> scripts, contents of Firefox jars and addon sources).
>
> 5. Write up the significant differences.
>

> We need to make the above a semi-regular part of our development process
> to periodically verify our build integrity.
>
> Writing up the differences you find will also be useful for us to help us
> work towards #3688, especially for Mac and Linux builds (which are likely
> pretty darn close.. It's probably only some timestamps and symbol names
> that differ if you use the same platform and compiler).
>
> If you want to be extra-helpful, you can write up a detailed howto
> (and/or just paste the ones you find that already exist) on the process
> itself to make it even easier for others to learn and participate.
>
> We'll need to do this often.. Perhaps not for every release, but at least
> randomly on some builds every once and a while. Also, BinDiffing
> existing, signed TBB copies from
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/ will be useful, too, so no
> need to wait for future releases. You can start today.
>
> Note that the above is a fantastic exercise in learning basic reverse
> engineering skills. Diffing vendor patches and malware updates is a
> common practice in the field. It's a useful skill to learn, if you have
> the time.
>
> Good luck!

New description:

 We have some concerning issues with our build processes. It's hard to
 really know for sure that the build machines are secure and not tampered
 with. See for example #5689. The most likely situation there is that AV
 signature engines fucking suck, and were false positives. However, the
 real fix is not simply scanning the build machines with more shitty AV
 software (although it was a fine, rational first step -- I'm not hating on
 you, Erinn). The real fix is unfortunately much harder: We need to ensure
 that the same source produces the same binaries everywhere: #3688.

 Other than build reproduction, it's nearly fucking impossible to know that
 the binaries you get actually come from the source you wrote and audited.
 A handful of Open Source projects have figured it out (see comments in
 #3688), but it's actually pretty darn hard on Windows, if not impossible.

 As a stop-gap solution, it's occurred to me that we might be able to
 crowdsource hobbyists and people looking to learn reversing (or if we're
 really lucky, some people who already have these skills) to both help
 verify previous builds, and give us the input we need to proceed on #3688.

 If you have access to IDA Pro
 ([http://blog.zynamics.com/2011/12/05/bindiff-4-0-available-today/
 BinDiff] will help, but is an extra $200 extension to IDA Pro and is not
 required), you can participate as follows:


 1. Download a signed TBB release from
 https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/.

 2. Compile your own TBB bundle. This is somewhat tricky and may require
 its own instructions which Sebastian is working on writing for Windows and
 Linux, and already exist in
 https://gitweb.torproject.org/torbrowser.git/tree/master:/docs/buildmachine_setups
 for Mac OS.

 3. BinDiff the resulting packaging exe as well as the exes contained
 therein.

 If you lack BinDiff, you should consider focusing your efforts on MacOS
 and Linux packages, which should be substantially more similar than
 Windows, especially if you build on Debian/Lenny or MacOS 10.7 with Xcode
 4. Start with using the 'cmp' (or hexdump and diff) Unix commands to find
 the differing sections of the binaries, and then use IDA Pro to inspect
 those sections.

 You should be able to use IDA Pro for any platform to analyze binaries for
 any other platform. You do not need to buy the MacOS copy to analyze MacOS
 binaries.

 4. Text diff the non-exe components (for example, conf files, shell
 scripts, contents of Firefox jars and addon sources).

 5. Write up the significant differences.


 We need to make the above a semi-regular part of our development process
 to periodically verify our build integrity.

 Writing up the differences you find will also be useful for us to help us
 work towards #3688, especially for Mac and Linux builds (which are likely
 pretty darn close.. It's probably only some timestamps and symbol names
 that differ if you use the same platform and compiler).

 If you want to be extra-helpful, you can write up a detailed howto (and/or
 just paste the ones you find that already exist) on the process itself to
 make it even easier for others to learn and participate.

 We'll need to do this often.. Perhaps not for every release, but at least
 randomly on some builds every once and a while. Also, BinDiffing archived
 signed TBB copies from https://archive.torproject.org/tor-package-
 archive/torbrowser/ will be useful, too, so no need to wait for future
 releases. You can start today.

 Note that the above is a fantastic exercise in learning basic reverse
 engineering skills. Diffing vendor patches and malware updates is a common
 practice in the field. It's a useful skill to learn, if you have the time.

 Good luck!

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5837#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs