[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #2286 [Tor Directory Authority]: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes

#2286: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:                    
     Type:  defect                   |         Status:  new               
 Priority:  major                    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component:  Tor Directory Authority  |        Version:                    
 Keywords:  arma-cares               |         Parent:                    
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:                    
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 So, the idea for A would need a quick spec IIUC; are you suggesting that:
    * 1: we should cap the consensus bandwidth if it comes down to a vote
 between non-measuring authorities. (New consensus method needed.)
    * 2: we should cap the amount of bandwidth an authority will vote that
 a router has, if it's not measuring. (No new consensus method needed.)
    * 3: something else?

 I can implement either one.  I would really like somebody else to do A'. I
 have enough crazy stuff to do.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2286#comment:14>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs