[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #2286 [Tor Directory Authority]: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes
#2286: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component: Tor Directory Authority | Version:
Keywords: arma-cares | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:15 nickm]:
> To describe it in full, see branch "bug2286_part_a" in my public torspec
repo.
Am I reading your branch wrong, or is there no relevant commit here?
> To see an (untested!) implementation, please review branch
"bug2286_part_a" in my public tor repo.
I'm afraid we'll need a bit more complexity here -- for starters, we don't
want to cap everybody when there aren't three measuring authorities. I
wonder if it would be simpler just to have bwauths vote at-most-50KB on
relays they don't have an opinion about. That would also make it really
easy for us to adapt it to be vote-at-most-.1% in the future. The downside
is that it would now be harder to recognize whether the vote is an actual
vote or a cap vote. We could have them say something else on the w line if
it's a cap vote, to distinguish. Starts to get a bit klunky though.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2286#comment:19>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs