[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #2286 [Tor Directory Authority]: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes

#2286: We still use self-published relay bandwidth sometimes
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:                    
     Type:  defect                   |         Status:  needs_review      
 Priority:  major                    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component:  Tor Directory Authority  |        Version:                    
 Keywords:  arma-cares               |         Parent:                    
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:                    
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by nickm):

 Roger, I don't get at this point why you prefer your alternative approach
 (vote differently) vs the one I started to implement (consense
 differently).  I kind of prefer the latter, since it doesn't change the
 meaning of any vote, and it looks like we'll probably need a new consensus
 method anyway.

 Mike, assuming that we're going to do _something_ so that the output of
 the consensus  changes here such that nodes can't get high bandwidth in
 the consensus when they're not measured -- what *would* work to keep
 measurements happy?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2286#comment:29>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs