[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #12023 [Tor]: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy cell?

#12023: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy
cell?
------------------------+--------------------------------
     Reporter:  nickm   |      Owner:
         Type:  defect  |     Status:  new
     Priority:  normal  |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
    Component:  Tor     |    Version:
   Resolution:          |   Keywords:  tor-client
Actual Points:          |  Parent ID:
       Points:          |
------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by nickm):

 Sure, I agree that if we keep the current behavior, we should change the
 name to last_added_nonidle_cell or something.  My question is whether a
 DESTROY cell should reset the timer for closing a connection because it's
 idle.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12023#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs