[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #23761 [Metrics/Website]: Add IPv6 relay graphs to metrics site
#23761: Add IPv6 relay graphs to metrics site
----------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner: metrics-team
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Website | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: core-tor-wants, ipv6 | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
----------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by karsten):
Replying to [comment:5 teor]:
> I've cc'd isis, because they will have a better idea of which IPv6
bridge stats would be useful. (I'd say "like the existing bridge stats",
or "like the IPv6 relay stats", but I'd only be guessing.)
Maybe we don't need isis for this, because there's really not much data
available for bridges and IPv6. For example, the bridge authority does not
confirm reachability of IPv6 OR ports, so we can only use what bridges
announce in their descriptors. And neither relay flags like `Guard` or
`Exit` have a meaning for bridges, nor have exit policies. We also have no
consensus weights for bridges. And measuring advertised bandwidth of
bridges does not make as much sense, because there's no load balancing in
place for bridges like there is for relays.
Basically, we only have "Total (IPv4) OR" and "IPv6 announced OR" for
number of bridges supporting IPv6. Here they are together in a graph:
[[Image(bridges-ipv6-2017-11-09.png, 700px)]]
So, assuming these three graphs ("Number of relays supporting IPv6", Total
advertised bandwidth by relays supporting IPv6", "Number of bridges
supporting IPv6") are what we should add to Tor Metrics, would you mind
suggesting some useful graph descriptions and other meta data? Basically,
we'd need three new entries into [https://gitweb.torproject.org/metrics-
web.git/tree/website/src/main/resources/etc/metrics.json this JSON
document]. If nothing comes to mind, we'll make up something, but I
believe descriptions will be better if they're at least based on your
suggestions.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23761#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs