[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #24174 [Metrics/ExoneraTor]: Use an embedded Jetty in ExoneraTor
#24174: Use an embedded Jetty in ExoneraTor
--------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: iwakeh | Owner: iwakeh
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/ExoneraTor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: metrics-2017 | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by karsten):
Replying to [comment:5 iwakeh]:
> The additional dependencies are not such a problematic thing. Simply
tomcat embedded for jsps plus the eclipse compiler. All available as
debian packages.
Different question then: if we need to include parts of embedded Tomcat,
why don't we switch to that entirely? It's the embedded part that we're
after, right? Or what else do we gain from picking Jetty in particular?
> Here the package listing:
> libasm-java (5.2-2)
> libtomcat8-embed-java (8.5.14-1+deb9u2)
> libecj-java (3.11.1-1)
Okay, that's good to know.
> Most other technologies won't have less dependencies.
Yeah, good point.
> BTW, the tweaked jar only prevents a duplicate include of a service
definiton that wouldn't cause harm, so a rather picky measurement.
I don't fully understand the benefit from preventing this duplicate. Can
you explain that? To be honest, I'd feel much more comfortable with a
build process that doesn't "tweak" provided library files. It feels
fragile.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24174#comment:6>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs