[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #4486 [Analysis]: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?
#4486: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: robgjansen
Type: task | Status: needs_information
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Analysis | Version:
Keywords: performance flowcontrol | Parent: #4506
Points: | Actualpoints:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment(by robgjansen):
I just uploaded a
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/4486/20121025-apollo-n23-combined.pdf
new set of graphs], created using arma's n23-2 branch (after fixing the
missing bracket). These were done with the large-m2.4xlarge distributed
with Shadow.
The graphs generally show improvement for small files only when using
'N3Initial 50' as evident in all of the time-to-first-byte graphs.
However, N23 seem to make things worse as more is downloaded through the
circuit. The only time-to-last-byte improvement is for the 50KiB perf
clients (who use a new circuit for every download), and again, only when
using 'N3Initial 50'.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4486#comment:37>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs