Re: [tor-bugs] #4008 [Tor Relay]: Identify safe, common, useful openssl engines to enable by default

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <torproject-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#4008: Identify safe, common, useful openssl engines to enable by default
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  nickm            |          Owner:                  
     Type:  enhancement      |         Status:  new             
 Priority:  normal           |      Milestone:  Tor: unspecified
Component:  Tor Relay        |        Version:                  
 Keywords:  crypto, openssl  |         Parent:                  
   Points:                   |   Actualpoints:                  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Comment(by tmpname0901):

 Which engines have been tried and found to be crash-prone?  Which have not
 yet been tried?

 A related quick-fix is to provide 64-bit Windows executables.  (I'm
 assuming that most users in Unix environments build their own Tor
 binaries.)

 The OpenSSL crypto code is just plain faster when built for a 64-bit CPU
 (relative to the same CPU running a 32-bit binary), and 64-bit Windows
 systems are no longer a rarity.  The cost in local system responsiveness
 while running a Tor relay on Windows would be greatly reduced by simply
 doing a 64-bit build of the same code that's being built now.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4008#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs