[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #23633 [Core Tor/Tor]: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?

To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: Re: [tor-bugs] #23633 [Core Tor/Tor]: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
From: "Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:38:22 -0000
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:38:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <044.2edec2ac127acfb8b1ffebb820fbf3cb@torproject.org>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-bugs/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "auto: Tor bug tracker status mails" <tor-bugs.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs>, <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-bugs>, <mailto:tor-bugs-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <044.2edec2ac127acfb8b1ffebb820fbf3cb@torproject.org>
Reply-to: no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tor-assistants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-bugs" <tor-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

#23633: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
--------------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  arma          |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect        |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium        |      Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal        |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                |         Points:
 Reviewer:                |        Sponsor:
--------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by nickm):

 Tugger claims to be Tor 0.2.9.11, but it can't be -- it is not emitting a
 "proto" line in its descriptor.  I wonder what software it's running.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23633#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

References:
- [tor-bugs] #23633 [Core Tor/Tor]: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
  - From: Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-bugs] #23566 [Core Tor/Tor]: options/validate__transproxy fails on FreeBSD (thanks to the new scheduler)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-bugs] #21759 [Metrics/CollecTor]: Add persistence for torperf/onionperf
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-bugs] #23633 [Core Tor/Tor]: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-bugs] #23633 [Core Tor/Tor]: Why does roflcopter have an empty protocol line in the consensus?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread