[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[or-cvs] r18356: {website} update the status of the low-bandwidth project (website/trunk/projects/en)



Author: arma
Date: 2009-02-01 01:20:03 -0500 (Sun, 01 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 18356

Modified:
   website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml
Log:
update the status of the low-bandwidth project


Modified: website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml	2009-01-31 18:28:22 UTC (rev 18355)
+++ website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml	2009-02-01 06:20:03 UTC (rev 18356)
@@ -309,35 +309,41 @@
 
 <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5">
   <td>
-    Dec 08
+    <a id="Jan09"></a>
+    <a class="anchor" href="#Jan09">Jan 09</a>
   </td>
   <td>
-  </td>
-</tr>
+<small><em><p>
+I wrote up the more detailed version of our new design idea,
+as an official Tor proposal #158:
+<a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jan-2009/msg00010.html";>http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jan-2009/msg00010.html</a>.</p>
 
-<tr>
-  <td>
-    Jan 09
+<p>
+I think this is finally the one! (Well, once I finish folding in all
+the comments.)
+</p>
+
+<p>
+One of the big reasons why the project isn't on its original schedule is
+that a main conclusion from <a href="<page projects/hidserv>">Karsten's
+NLnet project on hidden service performance</a> was that it's the circuit
+extension that's the main killer. Yet this project had proposed to add
+more round-trips and complexity into exactly that step. So we needed
+to build a better plan to achieve the original goal without screwing up
+performance even more.
+</p>
+
+<p>We've been revising the design proposal over the past weeks, and
+I think we'll be ready soon to start implementing. Note that since
+we have a bunch of development items we're hoping to land in mid Feb
+already, it's likely that this implementation won't land until late Feb
+or March. This time for sure!</p></em></small>
   </td>
-  <td>
-  </td>
 </tr>
 </table>
 
 <br />
 
-<!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what
-these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to
-do? :)
-<a id="People"></a>
-<h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>
-<ul>
-<li><a href="<page people>#Core">Peter Palfrader</a></li>
-</ul>
--->
-
-<!-- In the future, put links to proposal, preliminary results, etc. here -->
-
 </div><!-- #main -->
 
 #include <foot.wmi>