[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r11827: Add small comments to a couple of proposals. (in tor/trunk: . doc/spec/proposals)
Author: nickm
Date: 2007-10-09 22:30:34 -0400 (Tue, 09 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 11827
Modified:
tor/trunk/
tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/118-multiple-orports.txt
tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/120-suicide-descriptors.txt
Log:
r15617@catbus: nickm | 2007-10-09 22:30:22 -0400
Add small comments to a couple of proposals.
Property changes on: tor/trunk
___________________________________________________________________
svk:merge ticket from /tor/trunk [r15617] on 8246c3cf-6607-4228-993b-4d95d33730f1
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/118-multiple-orports.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/118-multiple-orports.txt 2007-10-10 00:05:10 UTC (rev 11826)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/118-multiple-orports.txt 2007-10-10 02:30:34 UTC (rev 11827)
@@ -51,5 +51,16 @@
between them when they get extend cells to the same server on
different ports.
+ - Suggested rule:
+ - If we're told to extend to IP:Port:ID, and we have a connection
+ to some server with ID, and we have confirmed that the server
+ likes the address we originally used when connecting to it (via
+ means in proposal 105), then use the existing connection.
+ - If we're told to extend to IP:Port:ID, and we have a descriptor
+ for the ID, and we have a connection to some server with ID,
+ and the existing connection is to an address listed as valid
+ in the descriptor, then use the existing connection.
+ - Otherwise, use a new connection.
+
- How this all interacts with coderman's ipv6 stuff (proposal 117).
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/120-suicide-descriptors.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/120-suicide-descriptors.txt 2007-10-10 00:05:10 UTC (rev 11826)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/120-suicide-descriptors.txt 2007-10-10 02:30:34 UTC (rev 11827)
@@ -74,3 +74,11 @@
tup suggested this idea.
+Comments:
+
+ 1) Don't name the official feature "suicide descriptors". Suicide is
+ irreversible, and the concept pushes many people's buttons. How about
+ "shutdown descriptors"?
+ 2) Maybe add a rule "Don't do this for hibernation if we expect to wake
+ up before the next consensus is published"?
+ - NM 9 Oct 2007
\ No newline at end of file