[tor-commits] [tor/master] sched: Don't get KIST stuck in an infinite loop

[nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

commit 3ef7e6f1870bf6bc2c26076c6abb545a576f9a42
Author: Matt Traudt <sirmatt@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Sep 27 16:11:05 2017 -0400

    sched: Don't get KIST stuck in an infinite loop
    
    When a channel is scheduled and flush cells returns 0 that is no cells to
    flush, we flag it back in waiting for cells so it doesn't get stuck in a
    possible infinite loop.
    
    It has been observed on moria1 where a closed channel end up in the scheduler
    where the flush process returned 0 cells but it was ultimately kept in the
    scheduling loop forever. We suspect that this is due to a more deeper problem
    in tor where the channel_more_to_flush() is actually looking at the wrong
    queue and was returning 1 for an empty channel thus putting the channel in the
    "Case 4" of the scheduler which is to go back in pending state thus
    re-considered at the next iteration.
    
    This is a fix that allows the KIST scheduler to recover properly from a not
    entirelly diagnosed problem in tor.
    
    Fixes #23676
    
    Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 changes/bug23676        |  6 ++++++
 src/or/scheduler_kist.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/changes/bug23676 b/changes/bug23676
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..90f9e3180
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changes/bug23676
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+  o Major bugfixes (scheduler):
+    If a channel is put into the scheduler's pending list, then it starts
+    closing, and then if the scheduler runs before it finishes closing, the
+    scheduler will get stuck trying to flush its cells while the lower layers
+    refuse to cooperate. Fix that race condition by given the scheduler an
+    escape method. Fixes bug 23676; bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha
diff --git a/src/or/scheduler_kist.c b/src/or/scheduler_kist.c
index 9e960cdef..2dddd3e9a 100644
--- a/src/or/scheduler_kist.c
+++ b/src/or/scheduler_kist.c
@@ -591,8 +591,23 @@ kist_scheduler_run(void)
       if (flush_result > 0) {
         update_socket_written(&socket_table, chan, flush_result *
                               (CELL_MAX_NETWORK_SIZE + TLS_PER_CELL_OVERHEAD));
+      } else {
+        /* XXX: This can happen because tor sometimes does flush in an
+         * opportunistic way cells from the circuit to the outbuf so the
+         * channel can end up here without having anything to flush nor needed
+         * to write to the kernel. Hopefully we'll fix that soon but for now
+         * we have to handle this case which happens kind of often. */
+        log_debug(LD_SCHED,
+                 "We didn't flush anything on a chan that we think "
+                 "can write and wants to write. The channel's state is '%s' "
+                 "and in scheduler state %d. We're going to mark it as "
+                 "waiting_for_cells (as that's most likely the issue) and "
+                 "stop scheduling it this round.",
+                 channel_state_to_string(chan->state),
+                 chan->scheduler_state);
+        chan->scheduler_state = SCHED_CHAN_WAITING_FOR_CELLS;
+        continue;
       }
-      /* XXX What if we didn't flush? */
     }
 
     /* Decide what to do with the channel now */

_______________________________________________
tor-commits mailing list
tor-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-commits