[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r6997: Clarify point about certs. We have been over this before, bu (in tor/trunk: . doc)
- To: or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [or-cvs] r6997: Clarify point about certs. We have been over this before, bu (in tor/trunk: . doc)
- From: nickm@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:54:10 -0400
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author: nickm
Date: 2006-08-09 02:54:02 -0400 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 6997
Modified:
tor/trunk/
tor/trunk/doc/tor-spec.txt
Log:
r7058@Kushana: nickm | 2006-08-08 23:53:46 -0700
Clarify point about certs. We have been over this before, but it seems simpler than what we are considering now.
Property changes on: tor/trunk
___________________________________________________________________
Name: svk:merge
- 1f724f9b-111a-0410-b636-93f1a77c1813:/local/or/tor/trunk:8207
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/eventdns:7014
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/mmap:7030
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/oo-connections:6950
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/versions:7056
+ 1f724f9b-111a-0410-b636-93f1a77c1813:/local/or/tor/trunk:8207
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/eventdns:7014
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/mmap:7030
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/oo-connections:6950
c95137ef-5f19-0410-b913-86e773d04f59:/tor/branches/versions:7058
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/tor-spec.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/tor-spec.txt 2006-08-09 06:41:29 UTC (rev 6996)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/tor-spec.txt 2006-08-09 06:54:02 UTC (rev 6997)
@@ -322,6 +322,12 @@
hello cells, but only if those clients are nonconformant. Am I right?
In any case, this seems way more reliable. -NM]
+ [IOW, the proposal would be: if the other side has a cert without OU=Tor,
+ send a HELLO cell. Otherwise, assume v0 unless they send a HELLO
+ cell. Way simpler, right? If we're dealing with something proxylike or
+ old, we might send an unexpected HELLO cell. If they die, they were badly
+ written. -NM]
+
5. Circuit management
5.1. CREATE and CREATED cells