[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r17546: {tor} the bridge family proposal really resembles 'dead' more than (tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals)
Author: arma
Date: 2008-12-09 18:51:02 -0500 (Tue, 09 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 17546
Modified:
tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/000-index.txt
tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/128-bridge-families.txt
Log:
the bridge family proposal really resembles 'dead' more than it resembles
'finished'.
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/000-index.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/000-index.txt 2008-12-09 23:50:35 UTC (rev 17545)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/000-index.txt 2008-12-09 23:51:02 UTC (rev 17546)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
125 Behavior for bridge users, bridge relays, and bridge authorities [CLOSED]
126 Getting GeoIP data and publishing usage summaries [CLOSED]
127 Relaying dirport requests to Tor download site / website [DRAFT]
-128 Families of private bridges [FINISHED]
+128 Families of private bridges [DEAD]
129 Block Insecure Protocols by Default [CLOSED]
130 Version 2 Tor connection protocol [CLOSED]
131 Help users to verify they are using Tor [NEEDS-REVISION]
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@
099 Miscellaneous proposals
FINISHED:
121 Hidden Service Authentication [in 0.2.1.x]
- 128 Families of private bridges [in 0.2.0.x]
155 Four Improvements of Hidden Service Performance [in 0.2.1.x]
CLOSED:
101 Voting on the Tor Directory System [in 0.2.0.x]
@@ -154,4 +153,5 @@
115 Two Hop Paths
116 Two hop paths from entry guards
120 Shutdown descriptors when Tor servers stop
+ 128 Families of private bridges
142 Combine Introduction and Rendezvous Points
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/128-bridge-families.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/128-bridge-families.txt 2008-12-09 23:50:35 UTC (rev 17545)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/128-bridge-families.txt 2008-12-09 23:51:02 UTC (rev 17546)
@@ -4,12 +4,8 @@
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Roger Dingledine
Created: 2007-12-xx
-Status: Finished
-Implemented-In: 0.2.0.x
+Status: Dead
- [This proposal is part implemented, and part dead (won't-implement).
- Roger should add a note and merge it into the spec.]
-
1. Overview
Proposal 125 introduced the basic notion of how bridge authorities,
@@ -31,21 +27,40 @@
out the details of how these volunteers find each other and decide to
set up a family.
+2. Other notes.
-somebody needs to run a bridge authority
+ somebody needs to run a bridge authority
-it needs to have a torrc option to publish networkstatuses of its bridges
+ it needs to have a torrc option to publish networkstatuses of its bridges
-it should also do reachability testing just of those bridges
+ it should also do reachability testing just of those bridges
-people ask for the bridge networkstatus by asking for a url that
-contains a password. (it's safe to do this because of begin_dir.)
+ people ask for the bridge networkstatus by asking for a url that
+ contains a password. (it's safe to do this because of begin_dir.)
-so the bridge users need to know a) a password, and b) a bridge
-authority line.
+ so the bridge users need to know a) a password, and b) a bridge
+ authority line.
-the bridge users need to know the bridge authority line.
+ the bridge users need to know the bridge authority line.
-the bridge authority needs to know the password.
+ the bridge authority needs to know the password.
+3. Current state
+ I implemented a BridgePassword config option. Bridge authorities
+ should set it, and users who want to use those bridge authorities
+ should set it.
+
+ Now there is a new directory URL "/tor/networkstatus-bridges" that
+ directory mirrors serve if BridgeAuthoritativeDir is set and it's a
+ begin_dir connection. It looks for the header
+ Authorization: Basic %s
+ where %s is the base-64 bridge password.
+
+ I never got around to teaching clients how to set the header though,
+ so it may or may not, and may or may not do what we ultimate want.
+
+ I've marked this proposal dead; it really never should have left the
+ ideas/ directory. Somebody should pick it up sometime and finish the
+ design and implementation.
+