[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r21101: {torflow} Add a WARN if the measurements grow stale. Also clean up log (torflow/branches/stable/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority)
Author: mikeperry
Date: 2009-12-05 15:28:53 -0500 (Sat, 05 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 21101
Modified:
torflow/branches/stable/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority/aggregate.py
Log:
Add a WARN if the measurements grow stale. Also clean up
loglevels so that NOTICE and INFO are quieter.
Modified: torflow/branches/stable/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority/aggregate.py
===================================================================
--- torflow/branches/stable/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority/aggregate.py 2009-12-05 20:24:01 UTC (rev 21100)
+++ torflow/branches/stable/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority/aggregate.py 2009-12-05 20:28:53 UTC (rev 21101)
@@ -35,11 +35,16 @@
NODE_CAP = 0.05
MIN_REPORT = 60 # Percent of the network we must measure before reporting
+
# Keep most measurements in consideration. The code below chooses
# the most recent one. 15 days is just to stop us from choking up
# all the CPU once these things run for a year or so.
MAX_AGE = 60*60*24*15
+# If the resultant scan file is older than 1.5 days, something is wrong
+MAX_SCAN_AGE = 60*60*24*1.5
+
+
def base10_round(bw_val):
# This keeps the first 3 decimal digits of the bw value only
# to minimize changes for consensus diffs.
@@ -234,7 +239,7 @@
# measure hibernating routers for days.
# This filter is just to remove REALLY old files
if time.time() - timestamp > MAX_AGE:
- plog("INFO", "Skipping old file "+f)
+ plog("DEBUG", "Skipping old file "+f)
continue
if timestamp > newest_timestamp:
newest_timestamp = timestamp
@@ -272,8 +277,8 @@
pre_filt_avg = sum(map(lambda n: n.avg_filt_bw(), nodes.itervalues()))/ \
float(len(nodes))
- plog("INFO", "Network pre_strm_avg: "+str(pre_strm_avg))
- plog("INFO", "Network pre_filt_avg: "+str(pre_filt_avg))
+ plog("DEBUG", "Network pre_strm_avg: "+str(pre_strm_avg))
+ plog("DEBUG", "Network pre_filt_avg: "+str(pre_filt_avg))
for n in nodes.itervalues():
n.choose_strm_bw(pre_strm_avg)
@@ -287,8 +292,8 @@
true_filt_avg = sum(map(lambda n: n.filt_bw[n.chosen_fbw],
nodes.itervalues()))/float(len(nodes))
- plog("INFO", "Network true_strm_avg: "+str(true_strm_avg))
- plog("INFO", "Network true_filt_avg: "+str(true_filt_avg))
+ plog("DEBUG", "Network true_strm_avg: "+str(true_strm_avg))
+ plog("DEBUG", "Network true_filt_avg: "+str(true_filt_avg))
tot_net_bw = 0
for n in nodes.itervalues():
@@ -346,20 +351,27 @@
missed_nodes += 1.0
# We still tend to miss about 80 nodes even with these
# checks.. Possibly going in and out of hibernation?
- plog("INFO", "Didn't measure "+n.idhex+"="+n.nickname+" at "+str(round((100.0*n.list_rank)/max_rank,1))+" "+str(n.bandwidth))
+ plog("DEBUG", "Didn't measure "+n.idhex+"="+n.nickname+" at "+str(round((100.0*n.list_rank)/max_rank,1))+" "+str(n.bandwidth))
measured_pct = round(100.0*len(nodes)/(len(nodes)+missed_nodes),1)
if measured_pct < MIN_REPORT:
plog("NOTICE", "Did not measure "+str(MIN_REPORT)+"% of nodes yet ("+str(measured_pct)+"%)")
sys.exit(1)
- plog("NOTICE", "Measured "+str(measured_pct)+"% of all tor nodes.")
+ plog("INFO", "Measured "+str(measured_pct)+"% of all tor nodes.")
n_print = nodes.values()
n_print.sort(lambda x,y: int(y.change) - int(x.change))
+ scan_age = int(round(min(scanner_timestamps),0))
+
+ if scan_age < time.time() - MAX_SCAN_AGE:
+ plog("WARN", "Bandwidth scan stale. Possible dead bwauthority.py. Timestamp: "+time.ctime(scan_age))
+
out = file(argv[-1], "w")
- out.write(str(int(round(min(scanner_timestamps),0)))+"\n")
+ out.write(str(scan_age)+"\n")
+
+
for n in n_print:
if not n.ignore:
out.write("node_id="+n.idhex+" bw="+str(base10_round(n.new_bw))+" diff="+str(int(round(n.change/1000.0,0)))+ " nick="+n.nick+ " measured_at="+str(int(n.chosen_time))+"\n")