[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r9645: note two things we might want to backport one day (tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches)
- To: or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [or-cvs] r9645: note two things we might want to backport one day (tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches)
- From: arma@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:35:41 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:35:55 -0500
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author: arma
Date: 2007-02-24 15:35:36 -0500 (Sat, 24 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 9645
Modified:
tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches/ChangeLog
Log:
note two things we might want to backport one day
Modified: tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches/ChangeLog 2007-02-24 20:28:41 UTC (rev 9644)
+++ tor/branches/tor-0_1_1-patches/ChangeLog 2007-02-24 20:35:36 UTC (rev 9645)
@@ -6,8 +6,11 @@
indefinitely, if they came from nontrusted authorities. Now we
discard them if they are more than 10 days old.
- Fix a longstanding obscure crash bug that could occur when
- low on DNS resources. (Resolves bug 390.)
+ we run out of DNS worker processes. (Resolves bug 390.)
+ backport something about r9603?
+ backport something about r9644?
+
o Minor bugfixes:
- Don't launch requests for descriptors unless we have networkstatuses
from enough authorities. This delays the first download slightly under