[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-commits] [sbws/maint-1.1] fix: doc: Separate Torflow/sbws differences
commit 6e83258c9282d51358c82eb7fc84232dfebfbde3
Author: juga0 <juga@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Feb 18 12:21:50 2021 +0000
fix: doc: Separate Torflow/sbws differences
into a new file.
---
docs/source/differences.rst | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/source/index.rst | 3 ++-
docs/source/torflow_aggr.rst | 35 -----------------------------------
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/source/differences.rst b/docs/source/differences.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f904e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/source/differences.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+.. _differences:
+
+Differences between Torflow aggregation and sbws scaling (May 2020)
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Torflow does not exclude relays because of having "few" measurements or "close"
+to each other for that relay.
+
+If there are not new measurements for a relay, Torflow uses the previous
+calculated bandwidth, instead of the new value::
+
+ # If there is a new sample, let's use it for all but guards
+ if n.measured_at > prev_votes.vote_map[n.idhex].measured_at:
+
+ [snip]
+
+ else:
+ # Reset values. Don't vote/sample this measurement round.
+ n.revert_to_vote(prev_votes.vote_map[n.idhex])
+
+The oldest measurements Toflow seems to take are from 4 weeks ago, while sbws
+oldest measurements are 5 days old::
+
+ GUARD_SAMPLE_RATE = 2*7*24*60*60 # 2wks
+
+ [snip]
+
+ MAX_AGE = 2*GUARD_SAMPLE_RATE
+
+ [snip]
+
+ # old measurements are probably
+ # better than no measurements. We may not
+ # measure hibernating routers for days.
+ # This filter is just to remove REALLY old files
+ if time.time() - timestamp > MAX_AGE:
diff --git a/docs/source/index.rst b/docs/source/index.rst
index 53c3886..85f8591 100644
--- a/docs/source/index.rst
+++ b/docs/source/index.rst
@@ -41,12 +41,13 @@ Included in the
documenting
how_works
generator
+ torflow_aggr
+ differences
code_design
state
config
config_tor
sbws
- torflow_aggr
implementation
bandwidth_distribution
tor_bandwidth_files
diff --git a/docs/source/torflow_aggr.rst b/docs/source/torflow_aggr.rst
index bc9420d..e9ae3b6 100644
--- a/docs/source/torflow_aggr.rst
+++ b/docs/source/torflow_aggr.rst
@@ -385,41 +385,6 @@ Per relay scaled bandwidth rounding
Finally, the new scaled bandwidth is expressed in kilobytes and rounded a number
of digits.
-Differences between Torflow aggregation and sbws scaling (May 2020)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Torflow does not exclude relays because of having "few" measurements or "close"
-to each other for that relay.
-
-If there are not new measurements for a relay, Torflow uses the previous
-calculated bandwidth, instead of the new value::
-
- # If there is a new sample, let's use it for all but guards
- if n.measured_at > prev_votes.vote_map[n.idhex].measured_at:
-
- [snip]
-
- else:
- # Reset values. Don't vote/sample this measurement round.
- n.revert_to_vote(prev_votes.vote_map[n.idhex])
-
-The oldest measurements Toflow seems to take are from 4 weeks ago, while sbws
-oldest measurements are 5 days old::
-
- GUARD_SAMPLE_RATE = 2*7*24*60*60 # 2wks
-
- [snip]
-
- MAX_AGE = 2*GUARD_SAMPLE_RATE
-
- [snip]
-
- # old measurements are probably
- # better than no measurements. We may not
- # measure hibernating routers for days.
- # This filter is just to remove REALLY old files
- if time.time() - timestamp > MAX_AGE:
-
.. _README.spec.txt: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torflow.git/tree/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority/README.spec.txt
.. _PID Controller: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller
_______________________________________________
tor-commits mailing list
tor-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-commits