[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [or-cvs] Implemented link padding and receiver token buckets

To: or-cvs@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: [or-cvs] Implemented link padding and receiver token buckets
From: Andrei Serjantov <aas23@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:02:36 +0100 (BST)
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: or-cvs-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: or-cvs@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:02:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20020716011218.1695D146926@moria.seul.org>
Reply-To: or-cvs@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-or-cvs@freehaven.net


> Log Message:
> Implemented link padding and receiver token buckets

So what have we decided about all this link padding stuff? Were we too
scared to debate these issues with each other? I have no strong views,
although it might have apperared otherwise from the emails!

A.

References:
- [or-cvs] Implemented link padding and receiver token buckets
  - From: arma@seul.org (Roger Dingledine)

Prev by Date: Re: [or-cvs] integrated use of getoption() into OR. removed getargs()an...
Next by Date: [or-cvs] Put in a note in README to explain how to compile (I had to...
Prev by thread: [or-cvs] Implemented link padding and receiver token buckets
Next by thread: [or-cvs] new config files, some bugfixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread