[or-cvs] r10850: on further looking, r10835 doesn't need a backport. i think. (tor/branches/tor-0_1_2-patches/doc)

[arma@xxxxxxxx]

Author: arma
Date: 2007-07-17 03:24:37 -0400 (Tue, 17 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 10850

Modified:
   tor/branches/tor-0_1_2-patches/doc/TODO.012
Log:
on further looking, r10835 doesn't need a backport. i think.


Modified: tor/branches/tor-0_1_2-patches/doc/TODO.012
===================================================================
--- tor/branches/tor-0_1_2-patches/doc/TODO.012	2007-07-17 02:53:17 UTC (rev 10849)
+++ tor/branches/tor-0_1_2-patches/doc/TODO.012	2007-07-17 07:24:37 UTC (rev 10850)
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
   o r10790: Don't include reasons in destroy cells from the origin.
   o Some fix for bug 455.
   o r10830 if nick thinks it's a real fix
-  - r10835 if nick thinks it's a real fix
+  X r10835 (no need to backport i think, the code is way different)
 
 
 Backport for 0.1.2.x once better tested: