[or-cvs] r15630: fix wrong HTML tags (website/trunk/projects/en)

[mfr@xxxxxxxx]

Author: mfr
Date: 2008-07-03 14:23:26 -0400 (Thu, 03 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 15630

Modified:
   website/trunk/projects/en/google.wml
   website/trunk/projects/en/hidserv.wml
   website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml
Log:
fix wrong HTML tags

Modified: website/trunk/projects/en/google.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/projects/en/google.wml	2008-07-03 17:00:42 UTC (rev 15629)
+++ website/trunk/projects/en/google.wml	2008-07-03 18:23:26 UTC (rev 15630)
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 <br />
 
 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what
-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to
+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to
 do? :)
 <a id="People"></a>
 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>
@@ -85,8 +85,6 @@
 </ul>
 -->
 
-</ul>
-
 </div><!-- #main -->
 
 #include <foot.wmi>

Modified: website/trunk/projects/en/hidserv.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/projects/en/hidserv.wml	2008-07-03 17:00:42 UTC (rev 15629)
+++ website/trunk/projects/en/hidserv.wml	2008-07-03 18:23:26 UTC (rev 15630)
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
     <a href="http://freehaven.net/~karsten/hidserv/perfanalysis-2008-06-15.pdf";>report</a>
     that has been made public on the Tor
     <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00019.html";>developer
-    mailing list</a>.</small></em>
+    mailing list</a>.</em></small>
     <br/>
     <small><em>The analysis also unveiled a few bugs which were responsible
     for part of the delay in making a hidden service available for
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
     we discovered that some improvements require more in-depth
     changes to Tor which are not directly related to hidden services. These
     changes cannot be achieved in the time frame of this
-    project.</small></em>
+    project.</em></small>
   </td>
 </tr>
 
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
 <br />
 
 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what
-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to
+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to
 do? :)
 <a id="People"></a>
 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>

Modified: website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml	2008-07-03 17:00:42 UTC (rev 15629)
+++ website/trunk/projects/en/lowbandwidth.wml	2008-07-03 18:23:26 UTC (rev 15630)
@@ -152,14 +152,14 @@
     bootstrapping. The results are not very surprising: a client
     fetches about 10KB of certs, one consensus for 140KB (now 90KB, see
     next paragraph), and about 1.5 megs of Server Descriptors (after
-    half of which it starts building circuits).</small></em>
+    half of which it starts building circuits).</em></small>
     <br />
     <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/138-remove-down-routers-from-consensus.txt";>Proposal
     138</a> shrinks consensus documents by 30% to
     40% and has already been implemented and merged into the spec.
     Implementation is part of the 0.2.1.x-alpha tree and the code will
     take effect once over two-thirds of the directory authorities
-    (i.e. 5 out of 6) have upgraded.</small></em>
+    (i.e. 5 out of 6) have upgraded.</em></small>
     <br />
     <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/140-consensus-diffs.txt";>Proposal
     140</a> does not directly relate to reducing initial download size,
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
     href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00013.html";>sent to
     or-dev</a>. There are some questions to be answered from other Tor
     developers first, but other than that I think it's fine and could
-    be implemented.</small></em>
+    be implemented.</em></small>
     <br />
     <small><em>The Big Thing is making clients not download all 1.5 megs
     of server descriptors. <a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/141-jit-sd-downloads.txt";>Proposal
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
     clients can fetch SDs on demand from routers along their circuit
     while they are building it (described in the draft), and deal with
     exit selection. We're still developing ideas for the last part;
-    some possibilities are mentioned in the draft.</small></em>
+    some possibilities are mentioned in the draft.</em></small>
   </td>
 </tr>
 
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
 <br />
 
 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what
-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to
+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to
 do? :)
 <a id="People"></a>
 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>