[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-commits] [tor/master] Comment that failure schedules always use exponential backoff
commit 527c0735f11d5a36aa1fb84dc30b624139ba8406
Author: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 5 01:45:28 2017 +1000
Comment that failure schedules always use exponential backoff
---
src/or/directory.c | 2 ++
src/or/or.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/or/directory.c b/src/or/directory.c
index ccec810..fc21078 100644
--- a/src/or/directory.c
+++ b/src/or/directory.c
@@ -3771,6 +3771,8 @@ find_dl_min_and_max_delay(download_status_t *dls, const or_options_t *options,
const smartlist_t *schedule = find_dl_schedule(dls, options);
tor_assert(schedule != NULL && smartlist_len(schedule) >= 2);
*min = *((int *)(smartlist_get(schedule, 0)));
+ /* Increment on failure schedules always use exponential backoff, but they
+ * have a smaller limit when they're deterministic */
if (dls->backoff == DL_SCHED_DETERMINISTIC)
*max = *((int *)((smartlist_get(schedule, smartlist_len(schedule) - 1))));
else
diff --git a/src/or/or.h b/src/or/or.h
index b7c67ba..8a217a0 100644
--- a/src/or/or.h
+++ b/src/or/or.h
@@ -1981,7 +1981,9 @@ typedef struct download_status_t {
* or after each failure? */
download_schedule_backoff_bitfield_t backoff : 1; /**< do we use the
* deterministic schedule, or random
- * exponential backoffs? */
+ * exponential backoffs?
+ * Increment on failure schedules
+ * always use exponential backoff. */
uint8_t last_backoff_position; /**< number of attempts/failures, depending
* on increment_on, when we last recalculated
* the delay. Only updated if backoff
_______________________________________________
tor-commits mailing list
tor-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-commits