[or-cvs] and i would like a pony.

[arma@xxxxxxxx]

Update of /home2/or/cvsroot/website
In directory moria:/home/arma/work/onion/cvs/website

Modified Files:
	volunteer.html 
Log Message:
and i would like a pony.


Index: volunteer.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home2/or/cvsroot/website/volunteer.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -r1.22 -r1.23
--- volunteer.html	22 Sep 2005 03:31:06 -0000	1.22
+++ volunteer.html	22 Sep 2005 05:27:42 -0000	1.23
@@ -123,7 +123,8 @@
 <h2>Documentation</h2>
 <ol>
 <li>Please volunteer to help maintain this website: code, content,
-css, layout.</li>
+css, layout. Step one is to hang out on the IRC channel until we
+get to know you.</li>
 <li>We have too much documentation --- it's spread out too much and
 duplicates itself in places. Please send us patches, pointers, and
 confusions about the documentation so we can clean it up.</li>
@@ -134,6 +135,9 @@
 <li>Investigate privoxy vs. freecap vs. sockscap for win32 clients. Are
 there usability or stability issues that we can track down and
 resolve, or at least inform people about?</li>
+<li>Can somebody help Matt Edman with the documentation and how-tos
+for his <a href="http://freehaven.net/~edmanm/torcp/";>Windows Tor
+Controller</a>?
 <li>Evaluate, create, and <a
 href="http://wiki.noreply.org/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO";>document
 a list of programs</a> that can be routed through Tor.</li>
@@ -208,6 +212,13 @@
 <li>How hard is it to patch bind or a DNS proxy to redirect requests to
 Tor via our <a href="http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#CompatibleApplications";>tor-resolve socks extension</a>? What about to convert UDP DNS
 requests to TCP requests and send them through Tor?</li>
+<li>Tor uses TCP for transport and TLS for link
+encryption. This is nice and simple, but it means all cells
+on a link are delayed when a single packet gets dropped, and
+it means we can only reasonably support TCP streams. We have a <a
+href="http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#TransportIPnotTCP";>list
+of reasons why we haven't shifted to UDP transport</a>, but it would be
+great to see that list get shorter.
 <li>We're not that far from having IPv6 support for destination addresses
 (at exit nodes). If you care strongly about IPv6, that's probably the
 first place to start.</li>