[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[or-cvs] r8384: two todo items we'll need for the blocking-resistance scheme (tor/trunk/doc)
- To: or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [or-cvs] r8384: two todo items we'll need for the blocking-resistance scheme (tor/trunk/doc)
- From: arma@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-cvs@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:24:13 -0400
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author: arma
Date: 2006-09-13 18:24:05 -0400 (Wed, 13 Sep 2006)
New Revision: 8384
Modified:
tor/trunk/doc/TODO
Log:
two todo items we'll need for the blocking-resistance scheme
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/TODO
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/TODO 2006-09-13 17:34:59 UTC (rev 8383)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/TODO 2006-09-13 22:24:05 UTC (rev 8384)
@@ -153,6 +153,13 @@
- Design next-version protocol for directories
- Design next-version protocol for connections
+For blocking-resistance scheme:
+ - allow ordinary-looking ssl for dir connections. need a new dirport
+ for this, or can we handle both ssl and non-ssl, or should we
+ entirely switch to ssl in certain cases?
+ - need to figure out how to fetch status of a few servers from the BDA
+ without fetching all statuses. A new URL to fetch I presume?
+
Deferred from 0.1.2.x:
- Memory use improvements:
- Look into pulling serverdescs off buffers as they arrive.