[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output

To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
From: nusenu <nusenu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:44:10 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 07:44:33 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1429962259; bh= 7pGRgBjOS5CqE9ucDGQw0GEIKMEYRSF+DIByjeY9D0Q=; b=btfqd3e9UqlMB2a/ WKKiaRrO20RQcLC1vAxhtnq1wGV1yolCeaxb9z2RRBjaGXE/CBm6qIQeJhDeSVOe HZmhqgtXeWGVvOyvGJbEUS8pqyW1FaCR2rOZfj2ZVlS4RkU+rmhS0ZFcwXqOF0Zt PVPd70z14BA36hSeHMW9bRVDIfM=
In-reply-to: <553B71B7.4080508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5537EB1A.5080705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <553A3FDB.3080103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <553B7009.1000202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <553B71B7.4080508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>> If their 'relays_published' timestamp match, they processed the
>>> same consensus, correct?
> That timestamp is updated as last step of the hourly update
> process. The details documents that you're fetching may have been
> updated before.  That would also explain some differences.

Wouldn't it make sense to mention/use the timestamp of the consensus
that has been used to generate the output instead then?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=cLTr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
  - From: Karsten Loesing

References:
- [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
  - From: Karsten Loesing
- Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
  - From: Karsten Loesing

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
Next by Author: Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
Next by thread: Re: [tor-dev] onionoo details document deterministic output
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread