> On 30 Apr 2016, at 01:13, Tom Ritter <tom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 3.4 Optional: Break-the-glass Emergency Directory Adjustments >> ... >> With even fancier crypto, even the witnesses would not >> necessarily need >> to know, but thatâs beyond the scope of this proposal and its >> desirability may >> be questionable at any rate. > > I love me some fancy crypto, but I question the need for this feature > at all, let alone more complex versions of it. This looks like a "golden key" from a distance, and, if there's a bug in the implementation, it could well become one. I'd want to make sure we really needed this feature before implementing it. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev