Re: [or-cvs] r16423: We put bw info directory into the consensus, also versions a (tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals)

[Peter Palfrader <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> 
> > > > +   "w Bandwidth=193671"
> 
> -rw-r--r--  1 weasel weasel 152368 Aug 11 22:27 bwcons.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 weasel weasel 149638 Aug 11 22:27 bwcons2.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 weasel weasel 144137 Aug 11 22:21 consensus.gz
> 
> consensus is a consensus like we have it right now, bwcons is the same
> with the new "w Bandwidth=1234" lines added and bwcons2 is the same only
> with Bw rounded (or truncated) to kilobytes instead of bytes.  I do not
> think we gain much from doing that tho.  Anybody think different?

Another point of view is that using kilobytes saves us half of what we
add with this, so the proposal and code now both use kb here.

-- 
                           |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/