Re: [tor-dev] IRC meeting to plan sponsor L milestones on Wed July 18, 15:00 UTC in #tor-dev

[Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/14/12 9:31 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:09:39 +0200
> Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Mike, Andrew, Roger, Runa: please update the wiki page with your
>> feedback in this thread.  Please keep the developer feedback per
>> deliverable as short as possible, ideally in a single paragraph.
> 
> We need a better way to have a conversation about these deliverables,
> for SponsorL now, and in the future as more of these situations come
> up. My only suggestion is to not use trac wiki and write endless
> replies in text over or under previous text, maybe riseup etherpad, an
> actual trac discussion plugin, gobby session, or something else similar.

Agreed, Trac's wiki is a particularly bad place for discussions.  That's
why most of the discussion was supposed to happen on IRC, and only the
discussion results should go on the wiki.  My request for updating the
wiki page was only about including discussion results from the
subsequent email thread (which I didn't anticipate, or at least not in
this volume), not about continuing the discussion on Trac.  See Mike's
latest edit for an example of what I had in mind (thanks for that edit,
btw!).

> As much as I dislike IRC as a decision medium, should we have another
> IRC meeting to discuss current state?

Sure, why not.  Can you give some more hints how the current state has
changed?  Would you moderate that IRC meeting?

Best,
Karsten

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev