teor wrote: > There are several issues in the PT 2.0 draft 2 specification. > > Some of them are minor typos or inconsistencies. Others are major > design issues that we might want to leave until a later spec> > But then more issues were raised in this thread: > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2017-July/012374.html Is that the last message in the thread? I think I saw it a month ago, but I've reread what I saw of it with comments from you, David Fifield, and Yawning Angel. From what I can tell, there isn't a major impact on the specific changes I've made; if deeper changes need to happen to the PT2.0 spec, then they may require additional changes in Tor, but those seem separable code-wise. The main thing I was given to implement was the JSON Parameter Block handling in the SOCKS flow. > And I wasn't able to get response from Brandon on them. I'm not sure exactly what's going on there, but I'll make a note to ask him about the state of this today. Thanks for pointing it out. -RTT
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev