Re: problems with the aci range too small?

[Paul Syverson <syverson@itd.nrl.navy.mil>]

Ahh, violent agreement. Yes, I meant half the name space not half the bits
(as is now in the code). I'll try to respond to your message in the
multiplexing thread tomorrow (sorry mislabeled a response in that thread).

aloha,
Paul

> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:56:44 -0500
> From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Paul Syverson wrote:
> > > Er. Essentially the same qualitatively; but we can handle more circuits
> > > my way. :)
> > >
> > OK I don't get that. The first bit determines which half of the
> > name space you are in and the rest is the same as before. What am
> > I missing?
> 
> Ok..I think the confusion lies in the word 'half'. What I think we both
> mean here is the lower n-1 bits of the aci (15 of the 16 bits). What we're
> currently doing in the code is using the first half of the bits (the first
> 8 bits out of 16) for one side, and the other 8 bits for the other side.
> 
> I'll fix it. :)
> 
> --Roger