[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Is Tor an implementation or a protocol?

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Is Tor an *implementation* or a *protocol*?
From: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:23:50 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:25:11 -0500
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

If I implement the Tor spec am I implementing the "Onion Routing Protocol" or
the "Tor Protocol"?

Is Tor just the name for an *implementation* of the protocol called 'Onion
Routing' ?

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Tor an *implementation* or a *protocol*?
  - From: Nick Mathewson

Prev by Author: PAYLOAD_LEN bug in spec?
Next by Author: Re: PAYLOAD_LEN bug in spec?
Previous by thread: Re: RSA-OAEP info trying to find...
Next by thread: Re: Is Tor an *implementation* or a *protocol*?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread