[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-dev] Two questions about dir-spec.txt
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Karsten Loesing
<karsten.loesing@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> as the subject says, two quick questions about dir-spec.txt:
>
>
> 1. The "s" lines of network status entries are specified as:
>
> "s" SP Flags NL
>
> Now, when a relay has no flags at all, which can happen in a vote or
> could happen in older consensus methods, that relay would have an "s"
> line just consisting of "s", not "s ".
>
> I think it makes sense to omit the SP, but should this be specified?
Yes.
> If so, how?
One of the easiest ways would be "s" NL | "s" SP Flags NL
> There are other lines where it's not specified whether a trailing SP is
> permitted or not. But I think I only encountered "s" lines without any
> list elements so far.
IIRC trailing space is permitted while parsing but should never be
required or emitted.
> (I ran into problems here a while ago, when I looked for lines starting
> with "s " to overwrite an sLine string variable. But there was no "s "
> line for some relays, so the program used the "s " line from the
> previous relay. Went unnoticed. Ugh.)
>
>
> 2. The "m" lines in votes are not in dir-spec.txt. I haven't looked at
> proposal 158 yet. Is that proposal up-to-date?
It should be, IIRC, but see also 162. I have a ticket somewhere to
merge it back into dir-spec
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev