Re: [tor-dev] Git hosting changes, git:// support discontinued

[Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Jason Cooper <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 [...]
>> On a tangent, referring to keys by their short (or long, for that
>> matter) keyid is not a good idea. How to verify Nick actually has the
>> blessing of the Tor project (or any subset of people therein, etc) to
>> sign tags is yet another problematic area without a real solution.
>
> Yes, using the 32bit identifier certainly is prone to collisions, but we
> also aren't attempting to validate that key in this thread.  At the 2013
> Kernel Summit, Linus advised using 12 characters for abbreviated commit
> hashes over the current norm of 7.  Same problem, different aspect.

Yeah; and it's not like generating collisions or second preimages on a
48-bit identifier is out-of-reach for a bored undergraduate.  Using a
12-char abbreviated ID this long will prevent more accidental
collisions, but for resisting deliberate collisions, I won't really be
happy until git migrates away from SHA1 entirely.

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev