On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 22:33:34 -0500 Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I also look forward to the binaries that are coming this week. I > imagine there will be some sharp edges for folks whose Linux distro > doesn't easily come with the right version of bubblewrap -- so it > would be great if people here could help us identify and resolve > those sharp edges. The only system(s) where this is an issue as far as I know is Ubuntu and derivatives (Unless you don't trust AUR, in which case, Arch Linux also doesn't have a package). It's worth keeping in mind that the only place (by design) that the sandbox code checks for the `bwrap` binary is `/usr/bin/bwrap` because people should be getting their bubblewrap from a trusted source, and I am envisioning a bright future when it's available as a package for all distributions. Regards, -- Yawning Angel
Attachment:
pgp_LusdMaPoC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev