[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?

To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
From: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:25:31 +1100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:21:41 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=jzC24TBLgzvnAud3VvQoVj0TnQK8GzBgsQAOxCd4fCo=; b=tZXMR7fI9+K2LmeQOgUSn32k3Rr5anZXUghs6iB3YcjBx2oVHrzPsxa4hzruLMEXlR VkspThzBYI639JS6arc0LKeNzvF51mpeFzfgQkqDZIVZOZcopEGByjzAm3o5NOymUBwK II/ivb+lV9lkJZG7xBDivms5zfabw1MX/HFnZoff0gLIhkKbEfXjx+XRuOJXyo3N1TUo /hrdCydME7+spLCm29gYsL8YdFy5mwwgVfFaqKeJ5ocNuS2iDlh1edK3XmZTcJ8ucNjI 34xst34JLaejFeVO3wGWbeBvGcPKSUrSolRBdXJvvWQti8AHnrcS/6qpa83CxklBtVxv MWUQ==
In-reply-to: <37a9c632-fe7a-fb52-f354-6c14e8030e76@riseup.net>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9b19d136-1f48-2f6d-015e-f419b46ba413@riseup.net> <A23A02B6-E826-4CCB-B8BA-24CBCD82234F@gmail.com> <7cc18ae1-9c3a-7388-cf8f-eb4af64359b4@riseup.net> <FF2CD16C-2AD2-41D3-B9F2-AA3DF1492898@gmail.com> <37a9c632-fe7a-fb52-f354-6c14e8030e76@riseup.net>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 12 Dec 2017, at 07:29, nusenu <nusenu-lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Absolute single relay cw caps do not have that problem and would prevent
> insane cw values like >800000.
> 
> I'll setup automatic notifications if certain thresholds are reached.

If we can come up with a threshold that would apply for the next 5-10 years,
we could add a consensus weight limit to tor authority votes, or to the bwauth
code.

T
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

References:
- [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
  - From: nusenu

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-dev] UX improvement proposal: Onion auto-redirects using Alt-Svc HTTP header
Next by Author: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 286: Controller APIs for hibernation access on mobile
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] How about capping single operators to max. 10% exit capacity of the network?
Next by thread: [tor-dev] Help Wanted: Fallback Directory Update
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread