[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: (Desperate) Plea for multi-person code review
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (Desperate) Plea for multi-person code review
- From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:22:06 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:22:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qwTMvuCVy8YFo2jAyoDrMGSp02CYkeoCH4k34CJ05yY=; b=Uh2R/viRKEa36AN+4PLmuVkZgAoRUbfB2Ds4mffOVaF2Pvlob7cevSO/p2yQ32KVoR UwemsCpDHgjUe52ly9naLUCJXeTE3qfw84kpKSWIho8O4PJNyuGJYfUwpYl5CMzAG8b2 BuNLfMWRjo1T114u4keAFU6HTPoSyWt/aw0qg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cUFZePZSsWxcumFnhNyHYUNLWxfQaU2B56TOwBr/2r9hHXg9X963xlMvsflK3pA/Yr IqB2pSaRPpbHqkAZFWBnEcbmGgTm383ax7pjpO3DivjaSkAMmsgH/UZ1w4wsoNdyycQh AYnNv9MX8VqqvCAn+7b6sST9uQem63/pmk1sk=
- In-reply-to: <20100215020948.GI23393@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20100214045258.GG10772@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100215020948.GI23393@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Mike Perry <mikeperry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've now rebased, split, and squashed all the commits into 8
> logically distinct patches in mikeperry/consensus-bw-weights4.
> Should be easier to review for those who prefer to look at things
> one commit at a time.
>
Ouch. This is great for people who want to read your patch series de
novo, and it's good for clarity once we merge it into Tor's main
history, but it makes stuff harder for people who've been reviewing
the old patch series unless you say something like, "BTW, commit X in
consensus-bw-weights4 corresponds to exactly the same changes as you
had looked at up until now in consesus-bw-weights3, just cleaned up a
little."
thanks,
--
Nick