Re: [tor-dev] Tor and DNS

[Ondrej Mikle <ondrej.mikle@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/09/2012 10:58 PM, Ondrej Mikle wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 12:24 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> On 02/08/2012 11:47 PM, Ondrej Mikle wrote:
>>> On 02/08/2012 02:59 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Ondrej Mikle <ondrej.mikle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think if we want an extra field in the future, we want to put it
>>>> after the end of the response (that is, after total_len), rather than
>>>> having it be optionally in every cell.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>>>> That also means AXFR/IXFR would be off limits (I'm OK with that).
>>>>
>>>> Me too.
>>>
>>> Without AXFR/IXFR we could limit total_len to 2 octets.
>>
>> I'd really like to be able to AXFR. I think it's important to have Tor's
>> DNSPort able to do some of the most basic and common DNS stuff.
> 
> What about making a specialized tool for AXFR/IXFR (like tor-resolve)? Its
> interface could be listening for DNS packets and returning DNS-stream with
> AXFR/IXFR data. Since practically every DNS server open to AXFR/IXRF must listen
> on TCP, this can be much easier implemented using the already existing TCP
> tunneling in Tor.
> 
> I think this solution would make the rest of design simpler.

Another good reason for separate tool is to be able to specify the actual server
where to ask for *XFR. Using just standard recursion and asking master NS may
not always give the results you want.

Standard recursion with AXFR never worked for me in cases of servers listed
here: http://axfr.nohack.se/

Ondrej
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev