On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:50:22PM -0500, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Sorry to be pedantic. I don't want to make any mistakes... > > The NETINFO cell section of spec right *before* section 5 > refers reader to section 6.4 for details of NETINFO cell payload. Hi again Chris! NETINFO is from the draft for the next version of the Tor spec. It isn't in the current version. There may have been some confusinon about which version _was_ the current version: I've tried to clear that up. You can find the latest current version of the spec at http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/tor-spec.txt with adjuncts at http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/dir-spec.txt http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/rend-spec.txt http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/path-spec.txt and interface notes at http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/control-spec.txt http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/address-spec.txt http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/socks-extensions.txt > It appears NETINFO cells must specify IP addresses and CANNOT > just use hostnames but this is unclear from section 6.4 which > allows for hostnames. For reference, it will have to be IPs... once it's specified and implemented. > Also, I'm pretty sure the length part of NETINFO cell is supposed to > be in units of *bytes* but this wasn't specified in section 6.4 or > at least I missed it. > Yup, bytes. yrs, -- Nick Mathewson
Attachment:
pgpyCUCPxulxX.pgp
Description: PGP signature