Re: [tor-dev] Transitioning to new crypto (again, but with substance)

[Ian Goldberg <iang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:18:06PM -0600, Watson Ladd wrote:
> Dear all,
> After thinking hard about the issues involved with new cryptography in
> Tor I came to the following idea for a somewhat reasonable upgrade
> path for OP's and OR's that preserves everyone's privacy and security
> at all points (to the extent that this is possible: new connections
> are by new clients). The only issue is what actually goes out on the
> wire needs to be though through.
> 
> First note that the connection between the identity used to ensure
> EXTEND cells go over canonical connections and the keys actually
> presented by two OR's that have formed a connection can be pretty much
> arbitrary: it isn't necessary for the client to know what it is. So we
> could have each OR have an identity key that stays 1024 bit RSA for
> old ORs while newer ORs trust some snazzy new elliptic curve key,
> while using the same 1024 bits to form the identity. Note that if we
> use elliptic curves to secure the endpoints,(and don't mind
> incompatibility with old clients) the RSA key doesn't even need to be
> an RSA key.

I'm not sure what you're saying in this last line.  Are you saying that
the crypto uses the snazzy EC key, and the 1024-bit identity key is now
just an arbitrary 1024-bit string?  That doesn't seem secure to me:
another OR can just publish that same string, along with its own snazzy
keys?

   - Ian
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev